Q: If a word/sentence does constitute Kufr and a person says that but he does not understand its meaning, or does not intend its meaning, or out of ignorance, or by mistake does that make him a Kafir? Similarly, if doing something constitutes Kufr and a person does that out of ignorance, or by mistake does this make him a Kafir? I read this on the web: "...if an ignorant individual states a word and does not know that this word is Kufr, according to some scholars he will not be Kafir because he will be excused for not knowing. Some scholars had said they will be Kafir..."
And this:
" ...some scholars do not even excuse the mistaken individual who does not know the word he uttered or action he did indicates Kufr and makes Takfir. Especially the Mawarau'n-Nahr (Samarqand and Bukhara) Ulama from the Hanafi Madhhab have held the topic very tight and do not accept ignorance to be an excuse almost in every matter..."
And this:
" Aliyyu'l-Qari states: “if the statements of a Muslim indicates Kufr from 99 angles and Islam from 1 angle he will not be made Takfir of based on %1” and continues to explain the matter of stating Kufr as a mistake. In another place he mentions things similar to the Qadihan Fatawa regarding the same matter. In that narration he states: “The individual who states Kufr without knowing (it is Kufr) will not be Kafir. However, if this matter is a matter of Din that necessarily must be known, then he will not be excused for ignorance, and will be made Takfir of."
What is the majority view from all the madhabs in this issue, and which view should be acted upon?